For today’s entry I was asked to explore how we, as a
society, police masculinity. However, to
understand how we police it, we must first understand our definition of
masculine. In American culture, boys are
ingrained from a very young age on what is and isn’t “manly.” We construct a “box” that defines our view of
what is masculine and attempt to fit men in that box.
When a man acts to “feminine” society is
allowed to ridicule that individual until they conform to our rigid views. When doing this, we expose our own
motivations as to why we devalue certain groups. Boys will call each other “fag,” “sissy,” “girly,”
and “retarded,” just to name a few. In
doing so, they are devaluing entire segments of our society; whether
intentional or not. This creates a “ranking
system” about masculinity that we put far too much value in.
At the top of the list is the idea of “hegemonic
masculinity.” This is our ideal
man. He is white, heterosexual, strong, holds
influence over others and is able to control his emotions. But why are we putting such definitions on
what it is to be a man? Is masculinity
merely black and white? Or is it possibly
a spectrum on which all people can be placed?
Based on these ideas, gay men, the disabled and women are
the furthest things from “masculine.”
Hence, why we degrade those we don’t feel are being manly enough by using
these insults. But these insults do not
only affect males, they affect the entire population that we degrade by using
terms like this.
This weekend, as I was riding around in my car, I thought
about the policing of masculinity while listen to rappers “diss” one
another. Over various songs, it was
clear to me that this is a very clear form of policing one another. Each verse was used only to degrade one
another through the use of sexist and homophobic comments. Here are two videos to help illustrate my
point:
Both of these songs use incredibly graphic and vulgar
language to ridicule and emasculate each other.
The constant use of sexist and homophobic imagery helps to show that
being masculine is a more desirable trait than femininity. Using this type of language further
propagates the marginalization of other groups of society. This only helps to reinforce the idealized
version of masculinity that society begs us to uphold. The only question is, why? Why do we hold ourselves up to an image that
can neither be attained, nor even existed in the first place?
No comments:
Post a Comment